MAFIA DON’s Financiers Deutsche Bank and “The” COMPANY … Bushs Obamas Clintons Bidens Pelosis and the DC Swamp Exposed’

JW

Financial Robbery Mechanics AKA BANKSTERS 101 SETTING UP THE PIGEONS https://youtu.be/CkMt4ddN7nI

Doesn’t George get it that politics in the age of Trump is a criminal enterprise, that politicians are no different from gangsters? They don’t go to the FBI and turn each other in. They don’t report crimes. They commit them

https://t.co/goMTHyX71P

 

SALON.COM
Russia, if you’re listening, La Cosa Nostra has moved into La Casa Bianca

The Great American Laundromat 

Real Estate and Money Laundering 101

SELF REPORTING   SARS  Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha

There’s always a Florida connection — More from NYT: “[Tammy] McFadden, a longtime anti-money laundering specialist in Deutsche Bank’s Jacksonville office, said she had reviewed the transactions and found that money had moved from Kushner Companies to Russian individuals. … On two palm-tree-lined campuses in Jacksonville, Deutsche Bank has thousands of employees who vet customers and transactions.  HER and Six current and former bank employees there said the operations were deeply troubled.”

 

FeedingThePidgeons

As Banksters WALTZ OFF WITH TRILLIONS https://youtu.be/FTnRbLBOIe8

The VAST DIRTY MONEY MACHINE associated with the LDS / MORMONS Donald J. Trump, the Clintons, Bushs, Obama and the USA Inc. TRILLIONS UP IN SMOKE

Looting of a Nation … The TRIAD and Martin Harris’s Hat … …… Moreover Harris is Chairman of the underlying Zions Bank (Utah and Idaho) and heads all the …
… TRILLIONS and the Trump Princess · The TRIAD and Martin Harris’s Hat … … The GREATEST LAND FRAUDS AND BANK LOOTINGS IN WORLD HISTORY … Apr 01, 2011 · The Crime of the Century – The Looting of America … front men are …. They Bought The System ( Gretchen Morgensen, Martin Meyer, Steve Pizzo, …
GAMES OVER https://duckduckgo.com/?q=trillions+looted+bank+fraud+land+ … The Houston CON / Mud Flats 101 · The TRIAD and Martin Harris’s Hat
Jul 2, 2015 – COM trillions looted bank fraud land swindles – Bing Intelligent search from Bing … From Lamar Terrace and TRIAD Center Salt Lake City Utah … HARRIS COUNTY TEXAS …… The End https://americalooted.wordpress.com/the-triad-and-martin-harriss-hat-seer-this-the-mormon-mafia-and-the-deep-state/.

THE VAST INTERNATIONAL MONEY LAUNDERING RACKETS EXPLAINED see Cause No. 2:19-CV-005 Eastern District Tennessee US District Court

3 Days Ago IMAGINE THAT 3 Whole Days

April 3rd 2019  Deutsche Bank Continues to Launder Billions

 

Years before regulators learned about what may be one of the biggest money-laundering pipelines in history, low-level bank employees in Jacksonville, Florida, sounded repeated alarms.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ksZSl4T0WNs

Jan 22, 2019 – The Federal Reserve is examining how Deutsche Bank AG handled billions of dollars … what could be one of the biggest moneylaundering scandals ever. … presence of Deutsche Bank, Bank of America Corp. and JPMorgan …

Lets Talk DIRT DEALING Donald Trump, Bring Obama the Bushes and Clintons with You

Pop2

Deutsche Bank’s
Running Tab of Investigations

Banksters3

GAME OVER <—<<< https://www.bing.com/search?q=trillions%20looted%20toxic%20zombie%20land%20swindles&qs=ds&form=QBRE

Banksters2

It seems  that  DON  MAFIA’s  Financiers are as  DIRTY as  They Come

OleSwampy

GAMES  OVER …. SWAMP  DRAINING STARTS  NOW

VANISHING TRILLIONS   Everything is  Rigged

TRUMP needs to PROSECUTE THE BANKSTERS especially the One’s that FINANCE HIM ” Make America MOB Again “

HOCUS POCUS DOJ FBI Racketeering

The BANKSTERS Own the White House and DOJ…

Banksters2

Deutsche Banksters  the Rap Sheet that Never Ends

The  Largest  Financial  SWINDLES and CRIMES in History

The TRIAD and Martin Harris’s Hat … SEER This Joe Smith … The Mormon MAFIA and the Deep State

Former US  Secret Service  Agent  RICK WILLIAMS …..  Conoco Phillips Oil   WOODLANDS TEXAS

From Gulf Manor Airport and the CIA to the 26th Floor of the Houstonian Estates … 33,000 Destroyed Emails and more than 1.5 Million Lay Dead … This is the  ACTUAL STORY … The TRUTH

About this website

 

FINANCE.YAHOO.COM
Donald Trump claimed on Twitter today that he has no “financial interests in Saudi Arabia.” But his financial ties to the kingdom go back a very long way. In 1991, Donald J. Trump was a mid-tier real estate developer with $900 million in debt, a collapsing casino business, and a name…

IT’s A  GLOBAL CRIME SCENE

Funded in VERY LARGE PART by  Laundered Money

These  Perpetrators  Fund LOTS of  Politicians and Their Campaigns  IT’s  a  GIANT  Campaign Finance  ORGY  a  GREAT BIG  DAISY CHAIN

Deutsche Bank

By Philip Mattera

Deutsche Bank’s position as one of the world’s leading financial institutions has been repeatedly tarnished in recent years in a series of scandals involving issues such as tax evasion and the sale of toxic mortgage securities. It has paid more than $3 billion  in penalties related to allegations of violating U.S. economic sanctions and manipulating the LIBOR interest rate index.

Founded in Berlin in 1870, Deutsche Bank played a major role in financing electrification and railway expansion in Germany as well as other countries. It continued to grow until Germany’s defeat in the First World War and Allied demands for reparations put the country’s banking system in a precarious position. To cope with the instability, Deutsche Bank merged with its main rival Disconto-Gesellschaft in 1929. The combined operation, now far and away the leading bank in Germany, weathered the Depression and ensured its political survival through the war years by providing financial support to the Nazi regime and removing the Jewish members of its board directors.

After the war, Allied authorities determined that Deutsche Bank had not only actively supported the Nazi regime but had also maintained close ties to officials such as SS chief Heinrich Himmler and had been involved in appropriating assets of financial institutions in countries overrun by the Nazis. The occupying forces divided the bank first into ten and then three regional institutions, one each for the north, central, and southern regions of West Germany. In 1957, however, the operations were reunited and allowed to function under the Deutsche Bank name once again.

The bank set out to build both its retail business and its international operations, which had been dismantled after the war. It became one of the leading participants in the Eurobond market. Deutsche Bank expanded its investments in a wide range of German companies, and the bank soon held seats on the supervisory boards of more than 100 firms, among them the biggest names in German industry. In 1984 Deutsche Bank purchased a 4.9 percent interest in the British securities firm Morgan Grenfell, and five years later purchased the remainder of the firm.

By the late 1980s Deutsche Bank was actively pursuing a goal of becoming a global investment bank and a Europe-wide universal bank, offering corporate and consumer services as well as mutual funds and asset management. The bank demonstrated its new assertiveness in 1990, when it wasted no time taking advantage of the collapse of Communism in East Germany by forming a joint venture with Deutsche Kreditbank (which four decades earlier had expropriated many Deutsche Bank operations). Along with its rival Dresdner Bank, Deutsche Bank left U.S. banks in the dust in the rush east.

Nazi Collaboration Again an Issue

Deutsche Bank’s Nazi ties became an issue again in 1986, when it purchased the Flick industrial empire around the same time that a Flick subsidiary paid about $2 million to belatedly fulfill a pledge it had made in the 1960s to compensate about 1,300 Jews who had been used as slave laborers in its gunpowder factories during World War II. In 1995 unearthed documents from East Germany provided new documentation of the ways in which Deutsche Bank helped the Nazis expropriate Jewish businesses. The bank later expressed regret when a historian’s report indicated that it had engaged in gold transactions with the Nazi regime.

In 1994 Deutsche Bank found its image tarnished because of its close ties with the giant Jurgen Schneider real estate group, which collapsed amid reports of accounting irregularities. Several Deutsche Bank executives were ousted in the wake of an auditor’s report that found that the bank was careless in its lending of some $750 million to Schneider.

To advance its goal of becoming a global investment bank, Deutsche Bank announced plans in 1998 to acquire New York-based Bankers Trust. Like Deutsche Bank, Bankers Trust was testing the limits of what a commercial bank could do, but its aspirations were impeded by a series of scandals. In the mid-1990s those controversies stemmed from charges of deceptive investment sales practices. One of its major institutional customers, Procter & Gamble, brought a racketeering suit that accused Bankers Trust of engaging in fraudulent practices in its derivatives business. (The bank settled the case for about $200 million.)

Just a few months after the Deutsche Bank acquisition was announced, Bankers Trust pleaded guilty to criminal charges that its employees had diverted $19 million in unclaimed checks and other credits owed to customers over to the bank’s own books to enhance its financial results. The bank paid a $60 million fine to the federal government and another $3.5 million to New York State. One executive later pleaded guilty to a related criminal charge.

Abusive Tax Shelters

Deutsche Bank was also having its own legal problems during this period. In June 1998 its offices were raided by German criminal investigators looking for evidence that the bank helped wealthy customers engage in tax evasion. In 2004 investors who purchased what turned out to be abusive tax shelters from Deutsche Bank sued the company in U.S. federal court, alleging that they had been misled (the dispute was later settled for an undisclosed amount). That litigation as well as a U.S. Senate investigation brought to light extensive documentation of Deutsche Bank’s role in tax avoidance.

In the 2000s, Deutsche Bank was cited numerous times by financial regulators for violations. In 2002 three U.S. agencies—the SEC, the New York Stock Exchange and NASD (the U.S. industry regulator now known as FINRA)—fined Deutsche Bank Securities $1.65 million for failing to adhere to requirements relating to the preservation of e-mail archives so they could be consulted in enforcement actions. In 2003 the SEC penalized Deutsche Bank $750,000 for violating conflict of interest rules by failing to disclose its role in advising Hewlett-Packard on the acquisition of Compaq Computer at the same time that its asset management arm was voting its clients’ proxies in favor of the deal.

In 2004 Britain’s Financial Services Authority fined Deutsche Bank’s Morgan Grenfell unit £190,000 for violating rules relating to program trading. Shortly thereafter, NASD fined Deutsche Bank $5.29 million for taking excessive commissions in the allocation of shares of initial public offerings and later that year fined the bank $5 million for corporate high-yield bond trading violations. Also in 2004, the SEC announced that Deutsche Bank would pay $87.5 million to settle charges of conflicts of interest between its investment banking and its research operations.

In 2005 the Federal Reserve and the New York State Banking Department announced that Deutsche Bank had agreed to take steps to improve its policies designed to prevent money laundering by customers. In 2006 the Financial Services Authority fined Deutsche Bank £6.3 million for “failing to observe proper standards of market conduct” in transactions involving shares of Scania and Cytos Biotechnology. That same year, Deutsche Bank agreed to pay $208 million to U.S. federal and state agencies to settle charges of market timing violations.

During this period, Deutsche Bank chief executive Jose Ackermann personally paid 3.2 million Euros to settle criminal charges that he and other directors of the German telecommunications company Mannesmann awarded excessive bonuses to Mannesmann executives.

In 2007 Deutsche Bank agreed to pay $25 million (and give up $416 million in unsecured claims) to settle litigation relating to its dealings with bankrupt energy trader Enron Corporation.

In 2009 the SEC announced that Deutsche Bank would provide $1.3 billion in liquidity to investors that the agency had alleged were misled by the bank about the risks associated with auction rate securities. Also that year, Deutsche Bank came under sharp criticism in the wake of revelations that it had used a private detective to spy on activist investors as well as some people inside the bank. Several executives were fired amid the scandal.

In 2010 FINRA fined Deutsche Bank Securities $575,000 for violating rules relating to short sales and then $7.5 million for “negligently misrepresenting delinquency data” in connection with the subprime mortgage securities.

Later that year, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York announced that Deutsche Bank would pay $553.6 million and admit to criminal wrongdoing to resolve charges that it participated in transactions that promoted fraudulent tax shelters and generated billions of dollars in U.S. tax losses.

In July 2014 the U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations accused Deutsche Bank and Barclays of helping hedge funds use dubious financial products to avoid paying more than $6 billion in taxes.

In December 2014 federal prosecutors brought suit alleging that Deutsche Bank had fraudulently used shell companies to evade taxes on a transaction that had taken place in 2000. The suit claimed that the bank owed the federal government $190 million in taxes, penalties and interest.

Dealing in Toxic Securities

In 2011 the Financial Services Authority fined Deutsche Bank’s DB Mortgages unit £840,000 for “irresponsible lending practices and unfair treatment of customers in arrears”; the agency also secured redress of approximately £1.5 million for DB Mortgages’ customers. That same year, a German appeals court ruled that Deutsche Bank had to compensate a small-business customer for losses incurred as the result of an interest-rate swap. The court concluded that the bank had a “grave conflict of interest” in its dealings with the customer. Also in 2011, the Federal Housing Finance Agency sued Deutsche Bank and other firms for abuses in the sale of mortgage-backed securities to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (the case was settled for $1.9 billion in late 2013).

In 2012 U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York announced that Deutsche Bank would pay $202.3 million to settle charges that its MortgageIT unit had repeatedly made false certifications to the U.S. Federal Housing Administration about the quality of mortgages to qualify them for FHA insurance coverage.

In late 2012 and early 2013 there were reports that Deutsche Bank was being investigated by U.S. prosecutors for violating sanctions against doing business with countries such as Iran and by prosecutors in several countries for participating in the efforts to manipulate the LIBOR interest rate index. At the same time, German authorities were stepping up an investigation of the bank’s role in tax evasion linked to carbon credits. Deutsche Bank’s offices were raided by prosecutors in late 2012 as part of the probe.

In January 2013 Deutsche Bank agreed to pay a $1.5 million fine to the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to settle charges that it had manipulated energy markets in California in 2010.

In February 2013 the bank had to delay the publication of its annual report and call an extraordinary shareholder meeting to respond to challenges by shareholders angry about the company’s legal problems.

In March 2013 Massachusetts fined Deutsche Bank $17.5 million for failing to inform investors of conflicts of interest during the sale of collateralized debt obligations.

In December 2013 Deutsche Bank was fined $983 million by the European Commission for LIBOR manipulation. Later, in April 2015, it had to agree to pay $2.5 billion to settle LIBOR allegations brought by U.S. and UK regulators.

In February 2014 Deutsche Bank agreed to pay the equivalent of about $1 billion to settle a longstanding lawsuit in which the bank had been accused of contributing to the collapse of the Kirch media group in Germany.

In December 2014 FINRA fined Deutsche Bank Securities $4 million as part of a case against ten investment banks for allowing their stock analysts to solicit business and offer favorable research coverage in connection with a planned initial public offering of Toys R Us in 2010.

In May 2015 the SEC announced that Deutsche Bank would pay $55 million to settle allegations that it overstated the value of its derivatives portfolio during the height of the financial meltdown.

The following month, co-chief executives Anshu Jain and Jurgen Fitschen unexpectedly resigned, reportedly under pressure from German regulators unhappy with the way they handled the investigation into alleged manipulation of benchmark interest rates by bank employees.

In November 2015 the investigation of Deutsche Bank’s sanction violations resulted in payments of $200 million to New York State regulators and $58 million to the Federal Reserve.

In December 2016 Deutsche Bank agreed to pay a total of $37 million to settle allegations by the SEC and the New York Attorney General that it mislead clients about order routing.

In January 2017 the bank reached a $7.2 billion settlement of a Justice Department case involving the sale of toxic mortgage securities during the financial crisis.

That same month, Deutsche Bank was fined $425 million by New York State regulators to settle allegations that it helped Russian investors launder as much as $10 billion through its branches in Moscow, New York and London.

In March 2017 Deutsche Bank subsidiary DB Group Services (UK) Limited was ordered by the U.S. Justice Department to pay a $150 million criminal fine in connection with LIBOR manipulation. The following month, the Federal Reserve fined Deutsche Bank $136.9 million for interest rate manipulation and $19.7 million for failing to maintain an adequate Volcker rule compliance program. Shortly thereafter, the Fed imposed another fine, $41 million, for anti-money-laundering deficiencies.

These  Perpetrators  Fund LOTS of  Politicians and Their Campaigns  IT’s  a  GIANT  Campaign Finance  ORGY  a  GREAT BIG  DAISY CHAIN

Deutsche Banksters  the Rap Sheet that Never Ends

It seems  that  DON  MAFIA’s  Financiers are as  DIRTY as  They Come

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/03/19/deutsche-bank-loaned-2-billion-to-donald-trump-over-two-decades-nyt.html

 

Deutsche Bank’s U.S. Exit

September 10, 2018

In April 2018, The New York Times reported that Deutsche Bank would shift its focus from Wall Street to Europe. A month later, Deutsche Bank confirmed that it was laying off 10,000 U.S. employees. Deutsche Bank leaves a trail of destruction in cities and towns across the U.S. In the last 15 years, Deutsche Bank committed widespread foreclosure fraud, securities fraud, tax fraud and rate-rigging. The bank paid out over $10 billion in settlements with the government and over a billion more to settle lawsuits by pension funds, investment groups, cities and states. Billions in liability remain as securities lawsuits and rate fixing lawsuits work their way through the courts.

During the foreclosure crisis and beyond, Deutsche Bank was the poster child for bad banking and unethical practices. Deutsche Bank was known for its rush to foreclose, and was widely referred to as “America’s Foreclosure King.” Deutsche Bank’s primary tactic was to simply overpower its homeowner opponents. Deutsche Bank relied on the economic reality that most homeowners in foreclosure would default when facing court action. Unable to afford an attorney and unwilling to face a court on their own, the majority of homeowners walked away, abandoning their homes after being served with court documents. Deutsche Bank often employed the shadiest of lawyers, those who would eventually be suspended or disbarred and sanctioned.[1]

In tens of thousands of cases, Deutsche Bank claimed the right to foreclose even though it could not produce the documents that supported its claim. Deutsche Bank claimed that the documents had been “lost, stolen or destroyed.” In the cases where a homeowner did attempt to respond, Deutsche Bank often simply dismissed the action it had filed, then came back a few months later, when the homeowner’s economic situation had become even more desperate.

When Deutsche Bank won in court, most neighborhoods lost. Deutsche Bank often abandoned the homes they had successfully claimed and left them to deteriorate. In 2008 and 2009, Deutsche Bank often owned more homes than any property owner in many counties. In three counties in South Florida in 2011, Deutsche Bank owned more than 1,400 homes.[2] Neighbors posted signs in front of houses owned by Deutsche Bank: “Rats in there, Bank don’t care.” Cities and counties regularly sent crews to houses owned by Deutsche Bank, to board up the smashed windows, cut the overgrown grass and weeds, and post “No Trespassing” signs. The cities filed liens against the properties for the expense of these maintenance efforts, and the liens piled up along with the debris.

In 2011, the City of Los Angeles, the second largest U.S. city, sued Deutsche Bank, the world’s 4thlargest bank, calling the bank a slumlord.[3] The city claimed that Deutsche Bank took title to more than 2,000 residential properties, but then allowed those vacant properties to turn into nuisances. According to the city, Deutsche Bank failed to maintain occupied properties, and illegally evicted tenants when a sale finally became possible. Deutsche Bank blamed the loan servicers, but eventually settled with the city for $10 million.

In 2018, the National Fair Housing Alliance (“NFHA”) and 19 Civil Rights Groups sued Deutsche Bank for race discrimination in 30 metropolitan U.S. areas, claiming that Deutsche Bank purposely failed to maintain its foreclosed bank-owned homes in middle and working class African American and Latino neighborhoods, while properly maintaining similar bank-owned homes in white neighborhoods. The lawsuit[4] included photographic evidence showing a pattern of discriminatory conduct in the maintenance of foreclosed homes. According to the NFHA:

The NFHA conducted an investigation of Deutsche Bank’s practices and examined 1,1,41 properties owned by Deutsche Bank after foreclosure collected evidence on 39 objective aspects of the routine exterior maintenance of each property investigated, and accumulated over 29,900 photographs of the pertinent conditions, such as unsecured doors, damage to steps, handrails, windows and fences, graffiti, the accumulation of trash and mail, and overgrown grass and shrubbery. Plaintiffs’investigation also documented marketing deficiencies, such as the failure to post or maintain appropriate “For Sale” signage, permitting negative signage and warnings to deter prospective buyers (e.g. “Bank-owned,” “Auction” or “Foreclosed” signs), failure to identify a real estate agent/broker or point of contact, failure to adequately display property listings on Realtor/Multiple Listing Services or other web sites, and displaying on-line or other auction sites in different states in lieu of utilizing a local real estate agent/company familiar with the neighborhood. Plaintiffs’ investigation revealed that there are highly significant disparities in the routine exterior maintenance and marketing of the Deutsche Bank-owned homes in communities of color as compared to white communities.

In a listing in a low income neighborhood in West Palm Beach, FL, current as of September 1, 2018, the listing described the Deutsche Bank owned home as follows: “Roof Needs to be Replaced; Ceiling Falling Through the House and Floor Has Structural Problems…The House Should be Demolished and Sold as a Vacant Lot.”[5] Deutsche Bank got a Final Foreclosure Judgment on this property in February 2018 for $288,603. The charges included $19,640 for property preservation. [6]

Deutsche Bank frequently kept foreclosed houses off the market for three to five years after it obtained a foreclosure judgment to delay reporting large losses to investors. Because of the poor maintenance, and resulting deterioration, the houses often sold for less than half of the foreclosure judgments. In many foreclosures resulting in judgments of $1 million or more, Deutsche Bank subsequently sold the homes for less than $500,000, often losing $500,000 to $1.1 million on each resale. These large losses were indicators that the lenders were unrealistic about home values. The homes that backed the loans sold to the trusts were over-valued. The securities companies that formed and sold the trusts ignored their due diligence obligations. Securities companies made money by “shorting” or betting against the products they were marketing to investors.

In the majority of the foreclosure cases, Deutsche Bank itself lost no money because it was acting as trustee of a mortgage-backed trust. Deutsche Bank itself originated over $20 billion in mortgage loans through subsidiaries which it sold to trusts. The subsidiaries included Chapel Funding LLC, DB Products, and MortgageIT, Inc. Deutsche Bank also sponsored trusts through its affiliate, DB Products. From 2004 to 2008, DB Products sponsored 128 RMBS trusts under the names ACE, DBALT, and DMSI, securitizing over $100 billion in mortgage loans.

Deutsche Bank acted as trustee for several thousand trusts holding trillions of dollars in home loans. Lawsuits by the government and by investors followed. In 2011, the Federal Housing Administration, the world’s largest mortgage insurer, sued Deutsche Bank and MortgageIT, alleging that the MortgageIT loans never qualified for federal insurance.[7] At the time of the filing, HUD had paid more than $386 million in claims on more than 3,100 of its FHA-guaranteed mortgages defaulted. More than two-thirds of those mortgages defaulted within two years of origination. When the lawsuit was filed, Manhattan U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara said that Deutsche Bank and MortgageiT “indulged in the worst of the industry’s reckless lending practices.”[8] The complaint sought treble damages on $386 million in claims as well as punitive damages and fines. Deutsche Bank settled the claim for $202 million in 2012.

One month after filing the MortgageIT lawsuit, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (”FHFA”), as Conservator for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, filed a lawsuit against Deutsche Bank alleging violations of federal and state securities laws in connection with securities sold to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.[9] The case settled in December 2013 for $1.9 billion, with Deutsche Bank paying $1.63 billion to Freddie Mac and $300 million to Fannie Mae.

The largest settlement by Deutsche Bank of a lawsuit brought by the government came in January 2017 when Deutsche Bank agreed to pay $7.2 billion for misleading investors in the sale of mortgage-backed securities. Deutsche Bank agreed to pay a $3.1 billion civil penalty under the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement act and $4.1 billion in relief to homeowners, distressed borrowers and affected communities. As a part of the settlement, Deutsche Bank admitted that it made false representations and omitted material information from disclosures to investors about the loans included in RMBS securities sold by the Bank.

In one of the largest private entity lawsuits, giant investment firms BlackRock, Inc. and Pacific Investment Management Company (“PIMCO”) sued Deutsche Bank in June 2014. BlackRock and PIMCO also included 564 trusts with over $568.2 billion in original loan balances as defendants. The lawsuit alleged that Deutsche Bank ignored pervasive deficiencies in the loan pools from 2004-2008 and failed to enforce repurchase agreements that were supposed to protect investors from defective loans.[10] Investors claimed that they had lost nearly $90 billion and were likely to incur substantial more losses.

According to the complaint, the loan originators ignored prudent underwriting standards and identified eight originators in particular who together originated over $333.7 billion in loans for the trusts named in the lawsuit: IndyMac Bank FSB, New Century Financial Corporation, Argent, American Home Mortgage Corporation, Impac Funding Corporation, Option One Mortgage Corporation, Fremont Investment and Loan and Wells Fargo. The complaint also alleged that five sponsors in particular were liable for selling the loans to investors: Morgan Stanley, RBS Greenwich, First Franklin, Barclays and Goldman Sachs and that Deutsche Bank knew that the trusts were filled with defective loans and knew of pervasive violations by the loan servicers. Three entities serviced over $283.1 billion in loans: Wells Fargo, IndyMac and Countrywide.

Pension funds were among the first to sue Deutsche Bank in claims related to mortgage-backed securities. The Massachusetts Bricklayers and Masons Trust Funds filed a class action lawsuit[11] alleging the securities that they bought were riskier than represented. The case settled for $32.5 million. In another case including Deutsche Bank as a defendant, The New Jersey Carpenters Health Fund, as lead plaintiff, and the Iowa Public Employees’ Retirement System, a class representative, were among many pension funds that recovered $165 million in March 2017 in connection with losses from securities issued by NovaStar Mortgage.[12] A similar lawsuit involving losses from RALI mortgage-backed securities bought by the New Jersey Carpenters Health Fund settled for $335 million in July 2015.[13]

Commerzbank AG sued Deutsche Bank and fur other banks in December 2015 alleging that Deutsche Bank breached its duties regarding the delivery of the mortgage files to the trusts and its duties regarding providing notice of defaults to investors.[14] According to the suit, Deutsche Bank failed to act prudently when defaults occurred and failed to act when the servicers breached their duties as well. The Commerzbank lawsuits were still working their way through the courts in 2018. Similar suits were filed by the FDIC, and by the National Credit Union Administration Board,[15] Phoenix Light SF Limited and Blue Heron Funding,[16] Royal Park Investments[17] and other investors.

While courts frequently rejected class certification in securities cases, a judge granted class certification in an ERISAcase brought by a large group of Deutsche Bank employees.[18] The employees alleged that Deutsche Bank and others violated their fiduciary duties by including in the company 401(k) plan high-cost investments that profited the bank. Deutsche Bank settled the case in August 2018 for $22 million.

In addition to the many securities lawsuits, Deutsche Bank also faced a lawsuit by the U.S. accusing it of tax fraud.[19] The U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York alleged that Deutsche Bank used “a web of shell companies and calculated transactions” to evade paying tens of millions of dollars in taxes.[20] In 2010, Deutsche Bank reached a non-prosecution agreement while admitting it committed criminal wrong-doing by creating fraudulent tax shelters known as Flip, Blips, Cards and Cobra. Deutsche Bank paid $554 million in penalties.

Deutsche Bank also agreed to pay millions to settle Libor (London Interbank Offered Rate) rigging lawsuits. In April 2015, the Justice Department announced that DB Group Services agreed to plead guilty to wire fraud regarding rate manipulation. Deutsche Bank was allowed to enter into a deferred prosecution agreement. Deutsche Bank agreed to pay $2.5 billion to settle the wire fraud charges including $800 million to the U.S. Commodities Futures Trading Commission; $775 million to the Justice Department; and $600 million to the New York Department of Financial Services. Investigators produced emails and online chats showing Deutsche Bank employees requesting changes in the rate to increase their own profitability.[21] The New York Department of Financial Services ordered Deutsche Bank to terminate several high-ranking employees involved in the scheme.

In January 2017, Deutsche Bank was fined $630 million by authorities in the U.S. and the U.K. who alleged that Russia used Deutsche Bank to move $10 billion out of the country because of Deutsche Bank’s failure to control money laundering. According to the U.K.’s Financial Conduct Authority, Deutsche Bank’s anti-money laundering controls were not strong enough to prevent $10 billion from being transferred out of Russia to offshore accounts.

In August 2018, Deutsche Bank settled a case brought by a former executive, Nizar Al-Bassam who was fired after an investigation into the bank’s hiring practices in Russia and whether the bank breached anti-bribery rules by hiring the children of Russian officials to secure new business. Deutsche Bank agreed to pay Al-Bassam his $4.7 million deferred compensation package which it had withheld.

In June 2018, Deutsche Bank agreed to pay $205 million to settle an investigation by New York’s banking superintendent of foreign exchange trading violations by Deutsche Bank. The Superintendent alleged that employees at Deutsche Bank participated in chatrooms where they shared confidential client information, and discussed the manipulation of foreign exchange prices. Traders also were accused of misleading customers by deliberately “underfilling” customers trade orders in order to keep part of a profitable trade for the bank’s own account.

In the investigations of banks and securities companies that sold bad loan pools to investors, a few Deutsche Bank employees became famous. The role of Greg Lippmann, a trader for Deutsche Bank, was analyzed in the Senate Committee Report on the causes of the financial crisis. The committee examined whether certain insiders knew that the mortgage-backed securities market was on the verge of collapse as early as 2005. The Committee obtained Lippmann’s emails in which he made statements abut the poor quality of the underlying loans including “This bond blows” regarding an RMBS security issued by Long Beach. Lippman also said “half of these are crap” regarding another loan pool. Lippmann bragged “I can probably short this name to some CDO fool,” and “I don’t care what some trained seal bull market research person says this stuff has a real chance of massively blowing up.”

In addition to disparaging the market, Lippmann and Deutsche Bank acquired a $10 billion short against the subprime market. When the market collapsed, those funds that suffered some of the biggest losses used Lippmann’s comments to show that Deutsche Bank had knowledge of the risks in the subprime mortgage market, but failed to disclose these risks to investors.

On September 11, 2017, the U.S. filed a civil fraud complaint against Paul Mangione, the former head of subprime trading for Deutsche Bank.[22] The United States alleged that Mangione engaged in a fraudulent scheme to misrepresent the characteristics of loans backing two RMBS trusts that Deutsche Bank sold to investors, resulting in hundreds of millions of dollars in losses. The lawsuit was brought pursuant to the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA).

The complaint alleged that Mangione engaged in a fraudulent scheme to sell ACE 2007-HE4 and ACE 2007-HE5 by misleading investors about the quality of the loans backing the securitizations and that Mangione misled investors about the origination practices of Deutsche Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiary, DB Home Lending, the primary originator of loans included in the deals. Mangione approved offering documents for these trusts even though he knew they misrepresented key characteristics of the loans, including compliance with lending guidelines, borrowers’ ability to pay, borrowers’ fraud and appraisal accuracy.

According to the government, the HE4 and HE5 offering documents also falsely represented that DB Home Lending had “developed internal underwriting guidelines that it believe[d] generated quality loans” and that DB Home had instituted a quality control process that “monitor[ed] loan production with the overall goal of improving the quality of loan production.” These representations were designed to instill trust in DB Home’s underwriting processes. According to the complaint, Mangione knew that these statements were false and his conduct was deliberately fraudulent. The complaint was still pending as of September 1, 2018.

In February 2018, Benjamin Solomon, the head trader for Deutsche Bank’s Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities agreed to pay $165,000 and to serve a 12-month suspension from the securities industry. Deutsche Bank agreed to pay a $750,000 penalty in the case and repay $3.7 million to customers. According to the SEC’s order, customers overpaid for CMBS securities because the bank misrepresented the price the bank paid for the securities. The SEC found supervisory failures by Solomon who allegedly failed to take appropriate action after he became aware of false statements made to customers by Deutsche Bank traders.

No Deutsche Bank officers, or other big bank officers, were criminally prosecuted by the U.S. Department of Justice. The reasons for the failure to prosecute have been analyzed. In February 2011, Matt Taibi wrote “Why Isn’t Wall Street in Jail” for Rolling Stone. In 2013, Frontlineran a segment called, “The Untouchables.” Ted Kaufman wrote “Why DOJ Deemed Bank Execs Too Big to Jail” for Forbes in July 2013. David Dayen wrote “Eric Holder Didn’t Send a Single Banker to Jail for the Mortgage Crisis. Is This Justice?” for The Guardian in September 2014. William D. Cohan examined for the Atlantic “How Wall Street’s Bankers Stayed Outof Jail,” in September 2015 and for The New York Times, “A Clue to the Scarcity of Financial CrisisProsecutions,” in July 2016. Patrick Radden Keefe wrote “Why Corrupt Bankers Avoid Jail,” for The New Yorker in July 2017. Brandon Garrett wrote “Too Big to Jail: How Prosecutors Compromise with Corporations,” Harvard University Press, November 2014, and Jesse Eisenger wrote “The Chickenshit Club,” Simon & Schuster, July 2017.

Lanny Breuer, the assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division of the U.S. Department of Justice and his boss, former Attorney General Eric Holder, have returned to Covington & Burling, LLP and are considered elite attorneys, among the top 100 attorneys in the country. Eric Holder said he will decide about a 2020 presidential bid early next year.

[1]In 2012, the New York Attorney General settled with the law firm Steven J. Baum P.C. requiring Baum and his firm to pay $4 million in penalties, costs and fees. The Baum firm was the largest foreclosure firm in New York State, filing over 100,000 foreclosure cases between 2007 and 2010, often representing Deutsche Bank. In 2014, the Florida Supreme Court disbarred David J Stern. The Stern law firm handled more than 200,000 foreclosure cases statewide, employed over 1,500 employees and was one of the primary firms used by Deutsche Bank to foreclose in Florida. The ABA Journal reported (January 13, 2014) that the Stern firm grossed $260 million annually. The Law Offices of Marshall Watson, another firm frequently used by Deutsche Bank in Florida, agreed to pay $2 million to settle foreclosure fraud charges. Three attorneys from the firm were suspended.

[2]Megan O’Matz, “German Bank Under Fire in Florida and at Home,” Sun Sentinel, July 15, 2012. The three counties were Broward, Miami-Dade and Palm Beach.

[3]The People of the State of California and the City of Los Angeles v. Deutsche Bank NationalTrust Company et al., Superior Court, State of California, BC 460878.

[4]National Fair Housing Alliance et al. v. Deutsche Bank, et al.,Case 1:18-cv-00839, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, February 1, 2018.

[5]Listing on Zillow for 717 37thSt., West Palm Beach, FL.

[6]Case 2017-CA-007056, Palm Beach County, FL.

[7]USA v. Deutsche Bank, et al., 11-02976, (S.D.N.Y. August 2011).

[8]Jonathan Stempel, “U.S. Sues Deutsche Bank in Mortgage Fraud Case,” Reuters, May 3, 3011.

[9]Federal Housing Finance Agency v. Deutsche Bank AG et al.,11:06919 (S.D.N.Y. September, 2011).

[10]BlackRock Balanced Capital Portfolio, et al. v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, et al.,Case 1:14-cv-09367-JMF-SN, Southern District of New York.

[11]Massachusetts Bricklayers and Mason Trust Funds, et al. v. Deutsche Alt-A Securities, Inc., et al., 08:03178 (E.DN.Y. April 2010).

[12]New Jersey Carpenters Health Fund, et al. v. Royal Bank of Scotland, PLC, et al.,No. o8-cv-5310 (S.D.N.Y. March 2010).

[13]New Jersey Carpenters Health Fund, et al. v. Residential Capital, LLC, et al., No. 09-8781 (S.D.N.Y.).

[14]Commerzbank AG v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, 15:10031 (S.D.N.Y. December 2015).

[15]National Credit Union Administration Board, et al. v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, et al.,14:08919 (S.D.N.Y. November 2014).

[16]Phoenix Light SF Limited et al. v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company(14:10103, S.D.N.Y. December 2014).

[17]Royal Park Investments SA/NV et al. v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company(14:04394, S.D.N.Y June 2014).

[18]Ramon Moreno, et al. v. Deutsche Bank Americas Holding Corp., et al.(1:15-cv-09936 E.D.N.Y).

[19]United States of America v. Deutsche Bank A.G., et al.,(14-cv-9669 S.D.N.Y December 2014).

[20]See Press Release, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of New York, January 4, 2017.

[21]Ben Rooney, “Deutsche Bank in $2.5 Billion Settlement Over Interest Rate Manipulation,” CNN Money, April 23, 2015.

[22]United States of America v. Paul Mangione, Case 2017-CV-5305 (E.D.N.Y. September 2017).

OVER STATED ASSETS …..  LIARS LOANS

SWAMP DRAINING STARTS NOW

 

 

Pop2

By ….  The National Swamp Draining Administration

I.

TAKE NOTICE OF Federal and International Penalties, Fines, Raids amounting to Tens of Billions in Fines and Penalties PAID to US Law Enforcement

 

SEE  GENERALLY   INTERNATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT REPORTS https://www.google.com/search?ei=cUiZXPfTJIuw_Qb73bGQCQ&q=BILLIONS+LAUNDERED+JP+Morgan+Deutsche+Bank++Danske+Bank++BILLIONS++FINES++SETTLEMENTS&oq=BILLIONS+LAUNDERED+JP+Morgan+Deutsche+Bank++Danske+Bank++BILLIONS++FINES++SETTLEMENTS&gs_l=psy-ab.12…0.0..20002…0.0..0.0.0…….0……gws-wiz.-e8gnppn8Is

 

     Comes Now  IFP Whistleblower  XXXXXX    XXXXXXXXX    and respectfully moves the Court to issue a TRO and Permanent  Injunction in this action pending a Full Trial on the Merits of the cause.  Premier Mortgage Funding Inc.,  Gerald Cugno Et Al, JP Morgan Chase ( Chase Home Mortgage ) and Deutsche Bank ( Germany / US Operations ) Select Portfolio Services, have all been heavily fined and penalized for Mortgage Lending tied directly to Criminal Money Laundering on many occasions.

 

  1.  The Lawyers for the Defendants in this case are WELL AWARE of many Billions of Dollars in Fines and Penalties They have collectively paid to US Law enforcement regarding obtaining Predatory Subprime Mortgages from Consumers such as Your Plaintiff   AND AS WELL Deceptively Marketing Said TOXIC / JUNK Mortgages to entities such as FHA, HUD, Fannie and Freddie Mac, FHFA and other US and International Investors.

 

  1.    See Global  News Releases and Media Accounts from the US Government Justice Department,  FBI, FinCen, SEC, US Treasury, US Congress Etc Etc Et Al. as well and Global News Media Outlets

 

https://www.bing.com/search?q=JP%20%20Morgan%20Chase%20Deutsche%20Bank%20SUBPRIME%20MORTGAGES%20Fines%20Penalties&qs=ds&form=QBRE

 

DAILYSABAH.COM

JPMorgan record not so clean with money laundering, manipulation

The impressive history of the U.S.-based investment bank JPMorgan Chase is littered with cases of money laundering, sanctions-busting and market manipulation; these criticisms have surfaced once again after its report on the Turkish lira caused high volatility in the currency in Friday’s trading

https://www.dailysabah.com/finance/2019/03/26/jpmorgan-record-not-so-clean-with-money-laundering-manipulation?fbclid=iwar115omyr1oqemsfvbwpkeat7lznvgjk2xdessdil7f39epjmqjovudlzig

 

  1.   Deutsche Bank to Settle U.S. Mortgage Probe for $7.2 Billion

https://http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-12-23/deutschebank

Dec 23, 2016 · Deutsche Bank will pay a $3.1 billion civil penalty and provide $4.1 billion in relief to consumers under a settlement in principle with U.S. authorities, according to a statement early Friday.

 

  1.   JP Morgan Chase agrees record $13bn settlement charges …

https://http://www.theguardian.com/business/2013/nov/19/jp-morgan-record…

Bank acknowledges it made serious misrepresentations to the public over the sale of numerous mortgage-backed securities

 

  1.   Misbehaving banks have now paid $204B in fines – CNBC

https://http://www.cnbc.com/2015/10/30/misbehaving-banks-have-now-paid

Misbehaving banks have now paid $204B in fines … Public outrage has focused on Wall Street institutions and their collective role in triggering the subprime mortgage meltdown that in turn led to …

 

  1.     JPMorgan faces money laundering probe: source | Reuters

https://http://www.reuters.com/article/us-jpm-probe-idUSBRE88E0G220120915

(Reuters) – JPMorgan Chase & Co’s compliance with U.S. anti-money laundering laws is being reviewed by a banking regulator, a source said, making the largest U.S. bank the latest target of a …

 

  1.  J.P. Morgan Chase Will Have To Pay A Fine Of $2 Billion …

https://http://www.forbes.com/sites/robertlenzner/2013/12/12/j-p-morgan

Dec 12, 2013 · J.P. Morgan Chase Will Have To Pay A Fine Of $2 Billion For Laundering $76 Billion For Bernie Madoff. … from its bank, JP Morgan Chase.” … sums of money between two clients of the same bank

 

  1.     Are more banks tangled up in Danske money-laundering …

https://http://www.americanbanker.com/articles/are-more-banks-tangled-up…

A number of lawmakers in Denmark want money laundering investigations currently focused on Danske Bank to include more firms. … markets learned of a raid on the offices of Deutsche Bank in connection with a separate laundering probe. Prosecutors in Germany have said the case is unrelated to Danske. … Danske also used JPMorgan Chase and Bank

 

 

 

 

9.     Deutsche Bank, BofA, JPM Drawn into Danske Money …

https://www.insurancenews.us/deutschebank-bofa-jpm-drawn-into…

Deutsche Bank AG and Bank of America Corp. have been contacted by U.S. criminal investigators for information about transactions they handled for a small bank branch in Estonia that’s at the center of one of the biggest moneylaundering investigations in history, according to two people familiar with the matter. The Justice Department investigators have also asked questions about JPMorgan

10.     Deutsche Bank, JPMorgan Chase Are Pulled Into Probe of …

fortune.com/2016/04/01/deutschebankjpmorganchase-malaysia

Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan Chase Are Pulled Into Probe of Malaysian State Fund. … asked Deutsche Bank AG and JPMorgan Chase to provide details on their dealings with 1MDB, as global …

11.     Whistleblower Implicates Deutsche Bank In $150 Billion …

https://http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-11-19/danske-moneylaundering

Just when Deutsche Bank probably thought the worst of its … the struggling German lender is being drawn deeper into the biggest money laundering scandal in … Mr. Wilkinson also hit out at “large US bank 1” — known to be JPMorgan Chase — which stopped its correspondent banking relationship with Danske in 2013 over concerns about the …

12.     JPMorgan busted for money laundering after accusing …

https://www.rt.com/…/410137-jpmorgan-busted-money-laundering-bitcoin

The Swiss subsidiary of US bank JPMorgan Chase has been sanctioned by Switzerland’s financial regulator FINMA for money laundering and “seriously violating supervision laws,” according to the local weekly Handelszeitung.

 

Individual Penalty Records JP  Morgan Chase ( SERIAL VIOLATORS )  :

250,000  MILLION ( 25  Billion ) Fines, Penalties and Criminal Settlements

Download results as or XML

Company Primary Offense Type Year Agency Penalty Amount
JPMorgan Chase toxic securities abuses 2013 DOJ_CIVIL $13,000,000,000
JPMorgan Chase & Co. mortgage abuses 2012 DOJ_CIVIL $5,333,600,000
JPMorgan Chase banking violation 2013 OCC $1,958,450,341
JPMorgan Chase Bank anti-money-laundering deficiencies 2014 USAO $1,700,000,000
JPMorgan Chase False Claims Act 2014 DOJ_CIVIL $614,000,000
JPMorgan Chase & Co. foreign exchange market manipulation 2015 DOJ_CRIMINAL $550,000,000
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. anti-money-laundering deficiencies 2014 FINCEN $461,000,000
JP Morgan Ventures Energy Corporation energy market manipulation 2013 FERC $410,000,000
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association banking violation 2014 OCC $350,000,000
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association banking violation 2014 OCC $350,000,000
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. banking violation 2015 FED $342,000,000
Chase Bank USA, N.A. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. consumer protection violation 2013 CFPB $329,000,000
JPMorgan Chase Bank interest rate benchmark manipulation 2014 CFTC $310,000,000
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association banking violation 2013 OCC $300,000,000
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC toxic securities abuses 2012 SEC $296,900,000
JPMorgan Chase & Co., and EMC Mortgage Corporation banking violation 2012 FED $275,000,000
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. investor protection violation 2015 SEC $267,000,000
Bear, Stearns & Co., Inc. securities issuance or trading violation 2006 SEC $250,000,000
JPMorgan Chase & Co. price-fixing or anti-competitive practices 2011 DOJ_ANTITRUST $228,000,000
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. banking violation 2013 FED $200,000,000
JPMorgan & Co. accounting fraud or deficiencies 2013 SEC $200,000,000
JPMorgan Chase consumer protection violation 2015 CFPB $186,000,000
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC toxic securities abuses 2011 SEC $153,600,000
J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. accounting fraud or deficiencies 2003 SEC $135,000,000
JPMorgan Chase & Co. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act 2016 SEC $130,000,000
JPMorgan Chase Bank data submission deficiencies 2015 CFTC $100,000,000
JPMorgan Chase securities issuance or trading violation 2013 CFTC $100,000,000
JPMorgan Chase Bank economic sanction violation 2011 OFAC $88,300,000
Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc. investor protection violation 2003 SEC $80,000,000
J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. investor protection violation 2003 SEC $80,000,000
J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. kickbacks and bribery 2009 SEC $75,000,000
JPMorgan Securities kickbacks and bribery 2016 DOJ_CRIMINAL $72,000,000
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. interest rate benchmark manipulation 2018 CFTC $65,000,000
JPMorgan Chase & Co. banking violation 2016 FED $61,900,000
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association banking violation 2013 OCC $60,000,000
JPMorgan Chase discriminatory practices 2017 USAO $53,000,000
JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. mortgage abuses 2015 DOJ_CIVIL $50,000,000
Williams Power Company Inc. data submission deficiencies 2006 DOJ_CRIMINAL $50,000,000
Banc One Investment Advisors Corporation securities issuance or trading violation 2004 SEC $50,000,000
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association banking violation 2016 OCC $48,000,000
JPMorgan Chase wage and hour violation 2011 private lawsuit-federal $42,000,000
Washington Mutual Bank wage and hour violation 2009 private lawsuit-federal $38,000,000
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association banking violation 2011 OCC $35,000,000
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association banking violation 2015 OCC $30,000,000
Bear Stearns Companies, LLC mortgage abuses 2008 FTC $28,000,000
J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. securities issuance or trading violation 2003 SEC $25,000,000
JPMorgan Chase employment discrimination 2018 private lawsuit-federal $24,000,000
JPMorgan Chase Bank accounting fraud or deficiencies 2012 CFTC $20,000,000
JPMorgan Chase wage and hour violation 2017 private lawsuit-federal $16,666,667
JPMorgan Chase wage and hour violation 2014 private lawsuit-federal $16,000,000
JPMorgan Chase wage and hour violation 2015 private lawsuit-federal $12,000,000
JPMorgan Chase wage and hour violation 2012 private lawsuit-federal $9,000,000
JPMorgan Chase wage and hour violation 2018 private lawsuit-federal $8,333,333
JPMorgan Chase wage and hour violation 2017 private lawsuit-federal $5,707,279
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. economic sanction violation 2018 OFAC $5,263,171
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. consumer protection violation 2017 CFPB $4,600,000
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC investor protection violation 2016 SEC $4,000,000
JPMorgan Chase wage and hour violation 2018 private lawsuit-federal $3,000,000
JPMorgan Chase wage and hour violation 2010 private lawsuit-federal $2,492,729
JPMorgan Chase wage and hour violation 2015 private lawsuit-federal $2,400,000
JPMorgan Chase & Co. employment discrimination 2006 EEOC $2,200,000
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association banking violation 2011 OCC $2,000,000
JPMorgan Chase & Co. investor protection violation 2008 SEC $1,998,143
Bear, Stearns & Co., Inc. investor protection violation 2006 SEC $1,500,000
J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc. investor protection violation 2006 SEC $1,500,000
JPMorgan Chase employment discrimination 2014 EEOC $1,450,000
JPMorgan Chase wage and hour violation 2012 private lawsuit-federal $1,195,000
J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. securities issuance or trading violation 2015 SEC $1,084,210
JPMorgan Chase wage and hour violation 2016 private lawsuit-federal $950,000
JPMorgan Chase consumer protection violation 2015 CFPB $900,000
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC financial institution supervision failures 2017 CFTC $900,000
JPMorgan Chase wage and hour violation 2013 private lawsuit-federal $770,000
Bear Stearns wage and hour violation 2010 private lawsuit-federal $675,000
JPMorgan Securities data submission deficiencies 2014 CFTC $650,000
JPMorgan Chase Bank securities issuance or trading violation 2012 CFTC $600,000
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC securities issuance or trading violation 2015 SEC $500,000
Washington Mutual Bank wage and hour violation 2011 private lawsuit-federal $463,000
Washington Mutual, Inc. wage and hour violation 2005 WHD $404,982
Bear Stearns Companies Inc. wage and hour violation 2003 WHD $358,974
J.P. Morgan Futures, Inc. data submission deficiencies 2009 CFTC $300,000
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. environmental violation 2017 EPA $230,392
JPMorgan Chase data submission deficiencies 2016 CFTC $225,000
JP Morgan Chase Bank workplace whistleblower retaliation 2016 OSHA $203,323
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC securities issuance or trading violation 2012 CFTC $140,000
JP Morgan Chase & Co. economic sanction violation 2004 OFAC $73,281
J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. and Forum Temporary Services labor relations violation 2006 NLRB $60,760
J.P. Morgan Securities investor protection violation 2014 SEC $54,000
JP Morgan Chase economic sanction violation 2004 OFAC $26,980
JPMorgan Chase Bank wage and hour violation 2004 WHD $19,373
JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA export control violation 2010 BIS $19,125
JP Morgan Chase Bank economic sanction violation 2004 OFAC $18,094
JP Morgan Chase & Co. economic sanction violation 2004 OFAC $17,303
JP Morgan Chase Bank economic sanction violation 2004 OFAC $9,748
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. wage and hour violation 2008 WHD $9,622
JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA wage and hour violation 2009 WHD $6,996
J P Morgan Chase Bank wage and hour violation 2005 WHD $6,688
Bank One economic sanction violation 2004 OFAC $6,682
Bank One economic sanction violation 2004 OFAC $5,500
J P Morgan Chase Family and Medical Leave Act 2007 WHD $5,008

 

 

  1.   THE CUGNO MORTGAGE BROKERING COMPANIES  Associated with the Birchfield Transactions were PUT OUT OF BUSINESS by  FHA and HUD Suspension of Their Operations because of Multiple Improprieties in Initiating Mortgage Loans such as the Birchfield Transactions.  SAID Conduct involved INFLATED APPRAISALS, KICK BACKS, 125% Funding to LURE and BAIT Consumers as well as Unlawful and Improper Charges, Fees and Kickbacks associated with the  CUGNO / Premier, Paramount and Pioneer Mortgage Business.

  1. FHA-Backed Loans: The New Subprime – Bloomberg

https://http://www.bloomberg.com/…/fha-backed-loans-the-new-subprime

Nov 19, 2008 · Inside Mortgage Finance, a research and newsletter firm in Bethesda, Md., estimates that over the next five years fresh loans backed by the FHA that go sour

  • Author: Robert Berner
  • Phone: (212) 318-2000
  • Location: 731 Lexington Avenue, New York, 10022, NY

 

B.   FHA-Backed Loans: The Next Subprime Crisis Looms – SPIEGEL …

http://www.spiegel.deEnglish SiteBusiness

More Bad Debt. Over the next four years, it became one of the country’s largest subprime lenders, with 750 branches and 5,000 brokers across the U.S. Cugno, now 59, took home millions of dollars and rewarded top salesmen with Caribbean cruises and shiny Hummers, according to court records and interviews with former employees.

 

  1.     Gerald Cugno – Previous Chairman for Premier Mortgage …

http://www.corporationwiki.comU.S.FloridaClearwater

Gerald Cugno Archived Record Clearwater, FL — Previous Chairman for Premier Mortgage Funding, Inc.

 

D.    Premier Mortgage Funding, Inc in Illinois | Company Info …

https://www.bizapedia.com/il/premier-mortgage-funding-inc.html

Premier Mortgage Funding, Inc is an Illinois Corporation filed on April 25, 2003. The company’s filing status is listed as Revoked. The Registered Agent on file for this company is ** Agent Vacated **. The company has 1 principal on record. The principal is Gerald Cugno from Riverview FL.

 

  1.    STATE OF ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL AND …

http://www.idfpr.com/Banks/RESFIN/Discipline/2009/2009-MBR-194.pdf

PREMIER MORTGAGE FUNDING ) License No. MB.6759041 ) Attention: Gerald Cugno ) 3001 Executive Drive, Suite 330 ) Clearwater, FL 33762 ) ORDER REVOKING LICENSE The DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, Division of Banking (the “Department”), having investigated the activities conducted by Premier Mortgage Funding (the

F.     PREMIER MORTGAGE FUNDING, INC. – ArkansasCorporates …

http://www.arkansascorporates.com/corp/166453.html

PREMIER MORTGAGE FUNDING, INC. is a company incorporated in Arkansas and its Filing Number is 100216164. PREMIER MORTGAGE FUNDING, INC. was filed on 07/30/2002. The company’s status is listed as Revoked. Contact Information. Company Name: … GERALD CUGNO , President.

 

  1.     PREMIER MORTGAGE FUNDING, INC. – ArkansasCorporates …

http://www.arkansascorporates.com/corp/166453.html

PREMIER MORTGAGE FUNDING, INC. is a company incorporated in Arkansas and its Filing Number is 100216164. PREMIER MORTGAGE FUNDING, INC. was filed on 07/30/2002. The company’s status is listed as Revoked. Contact Information. Company Name: … GERALD CUGNO , President.

 

  1.     67 Mortgage Lenders Failed To Meet Criteria For FHA …

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/67-mortgage-lenders-failed-to-meet&#8230;

But nearly 200 other mortgage companies ran afoul of HUD’s rules and regulations. … 67 MortgageLenders Failed To Meet Criteria For FHA Recertification. … Premier Mortgage Funding, Inc …

 

  1.   FHA terminates more than a dozen HUD mortgage originators .

https://www.housingwire.com/articles/fha-terminates-more-dozen-hud&#8230;

Home » FHA terminates more than a dozen HUD mortgage originators and underwriters. … The FHApulled HUD approval from the following mortgage companies: … endorsement approvals revoked …

J.     FHA Lenders: here we go again? – axiasd.com

https://axiasd.com/blog/2008/12/fha-lenders-new-subprime-lenders

“Jerry Cugno started Premier Mortgage Funding in Clearwater, on the Gulf Coast of Florida, in 2002. Over the next four years, it became one of the country’s largest subprime lenders, with 750 branches and 5,000 brokers across the U.S.” They go on to say, “…along the way, premier accumulated a dismal regulatory record.

II.

CONCEALMENT,  FRAUD, DECEPTION, LIES, HOCUS POCUS

These Defendants have been caught repeatedly and  MASSIVELY FINED

 

  • What is abundantly clear in this case is SIMPLE …. The Defendants in this Matter have been  REVOKED, RAIDED, Massive Fined by Many Law Enforcement Agencies on an International Scale.   The HALLMARK of these Perpetrators Activities have been HIDING, SECRETING, Failing to Disclose to Consumers and Governments that  UNLAWFUL PREDATORY LENDING PRACTICES and MONEY LAUNDERING Where All Being Perpetrated by the Defendants enabling the Mortgage Operations, IN FACT FUNDING SUCH with  Dirty Money being Laundered.

 

SEE  Generally   WORLD MEDIA  and US Government Information Releases.

https://www.bing.com/search?q=Money%20Laundering%20%20Chase%20JP%20Morgan%20Deutsche%20Bank%20%20Danske%20Bank&qs=ds&form=QBRE

  1.    These Defendants Lawyers NAKED, UNSUBSTANTIATED, VAGUE,  NEFARIOUS Claims that Plaintiff is engaging in Cut and Paste  Pleadings is PARTIALLY TRUE. The Internet News Sources provided are however from US Government Law Enforcement Agencies and Other US Government  Agencies together with the highest regarded News Sources in the World.

 

  1. Danske Bank’s money-laundering scandal – MoneyWeek

moneyweek.com › Economics

 

  • What Has Happened?
  • Why Didn’T Anyone Notice?
  • Did It Prove Profitable?
  • What Exactly Is Money Laundering?
  • Is It A Big Problem?
  • How Is London Involved?
  • Why Are They So Popular?
  • Danske Bank, until recently one of Europe’s most respected financial institutions, is at the centre of possibly the world’s biggest money-laundering scandal. Its chief executive, Thomas Borgen, was ousted this week over revelations about dubious flows of funds through its Estonian branch. The affair has its roots in 2007, when Danske took over Finland’s Sampo Bank, including its branch in the Estonian capital, Tallinn. During the eight years from then until 2015, an astonishing €200bn of non-…

 

See more on moneyweek.com

B.   Deutsche Bank Named in Danske Bank Money Laundering Scandal

https://www.financemagnates.com/institutional-forex/regulation/&#8230;

Deutsche Bank has been dragged into the money laundering scandal surrounding Danske Bank, with the firm acting as correspondent bank for the Danish bank. … Deutsche Bank Named in Danske Bank Money Laundering Scandal … amongst them Bank of America and JP Morgan, have started to emerge.

 

C.    Danske Investigators Contact BoA, JPM | PYMNTS.com

https://www.pymnts.com/news/banking/2018/estonia-money-laundering&#8230;

Investigators have reportedly contacted Bank of America Corp. and Deutsche Bank AG regarding transactions involving a Danske Bank branch in Estonia at the heart of a money laundering …

 

E.   Danske Bank Probe Expands As JPM, Deutsche Bank, BofA Face …

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-11-16/danske-bank-probe&#8230;

JPMorgan stopped providing correspondent services to the Danske Bank branch in 2013. Deutsche Bank and Bank of America continued for another two years, according to the reports and the people familiar with the matter. Deutsche Bank handled the bulk of these transactions during the period under scrutiny, one of the people said.

 

D.   Whistleblower exposes biggest money laundering scandal in …

https://www.sott.net/article/400990-Whistleblower-exposes-biggest&#8230;

Whistle Blower exposes biggest money laundering scandal in European history involving Deutsche Bank, JP Morgan and Danske Bank. … the whistleblower who helped blow the lid off Danske’s $234 billion money laundering scandal said during testimony to the Danish Parliament that $150 billion of the money had been cleared by a large European lender …

E.    JPMorgan faces money laundering probe: source | Reuters

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-jpm-probe-idUSBRE88E0G220120915

(Reuters) – JPMorgan Chase & Co’s compliance with U.S. anti-money laundering laws is being reviewed by a banking regulator, a source said, making the largest U.S. bank the latest target of a …

F.    JPMorgan ‘Seriously Breached’ Money-Laundering Rules …

https://www.nytimes.com/…/21/business/jpmorgan-money-laundering.html

Dec 21, 2017 · JPMorgan ‘Seriously Breached’ Money-Laundering Rules, Swiss Regulator Says Image Swiss financial regulators are placing a monitor inside JP Morgan Chase to review its anti-money laundering …

 

G.    Whistleblower Implicates Deutsche Bank In $150 Billion …

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-11-19/danske-money-laundering&#8230;

Just when Deutsche Bank probably thought the … the whistleblower who helped blow the lid off Danske’s $234 billion money laundering scandal said during testimony to the Danish … Mr. Wilkinson also hit out at “large US bank 1” — known to be JPMorgan Chase — which stopped its correspondent banking relationship with Danske in 2013 over …

 

H.   Is money-laundering scandal at Danske Bank the largest in …

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2018/sep/21/is-money&#8230;

Scale of fiasco highlights need for stricter regulation and cross-border force in Europe

 

G.   The Banks That Helped Danske Bank Estonia Launder Russian …

https://www.forbes.com/sites/francescoppola/2018/09/30/the-banks&#8230;

Sep 30, 2018 · Danske Bank Estonia has been revealed as the hub of an enormous Russian money laundering engine. … Money laundering is a multi-bank phenomenon. … J.P. Morgan, Bank of America and Deutsche Bank …

 

  • Author: Frances Coppola

 

H.   JPMorgan busted for money laundering after accusing …

https://www.rt.com/…/410137-jpmorgan-busted-money-laundering-bitcoin

The Swiss subsidiary of US bank JPMorgan Chase has been sanctioned by Switzerland’s financial regulator FINMA for money laundering and “seriously violating supervision laws,” according to the local weekly Handelszeitung.

 

  1.  Deutsche Bank Handled $150 Billion of Potentially …

dpl-surveillance-equipment.com/economics-and-finance/deutsche-bank…

JPMorgan Chase & Co. served as correspondent bank for Danske Estonia until 2013, when it was replaced by Bank of America Corp. , which cut ties with the Estonia branch over money laundering concerns in 2015.

 

J.    JPMorgan Chase to Present at the Deutsche Bank Global …

https://www.jpmorganchase.com/…/pr/deutsche-bank-conf-042717.htm

JPMorgan Chase to Present at the Deutsche Bank Global Financial Services Conference New York, April 27, 2017 – Marianne Lake, Chief Financial Officer of JPMorgan Chase & Co., will present at the Deutsche Bank Global Financial Services Conference at the InterContinental New York Barclay Hotel in New York City on Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 9:00 a.m. (Eastern).

 

K.    J.P. Morgan Chase Will Have To Pay A Fine Of $2 Billion …

https://www.forbes.com/sites/robertlenzner/2013/12/12/j-p-morgan&#8230;

Dec 12, 2013 · J.P. Morgan Chase Will Have To Pay A Fine Of $2 Billion For Laundering $76 Billion For Bernie Madoff. … from its bank, JP Morgan Chase.” … sums of money between two clients of the same bank …

 

  1.   On February  7, 2019, the  United States Congress  House Financial Services Committee,  the FinCen, FBI, DOJ and the CFPB have all announced the Deutsche Bank and JP Morgan with Danske Bank having already been fined many many tens of billions for laundering many many hundreds of billions are again under  US Law Enforcement Investigation and the US Congress. The announcement was just 29 days after THIS CASE WAS FILED and Complaints have been made by Your Plaintiff to the  Enforcement Branches of the US Congress, DOJ, FBI US Treasury, and  Consumer Finance Protection Bureau.

 

SEE    https://www.google.com/search?source=hp&ei=K22EXIK7PImL5wK9lo24Dg&q=Financial+Services+Committee++DEUTSCHE+BANK+&btnK=Google+Search&oq=Financial+Services+Committee++DEUTSCHE+BANK+&gs_l=psy-ab.3..0i22i30.5462.17803..18574…1.0..0.622.5395.29j13j1j1j0j1……0….1..gws-wiz…..6..35i39j0i131j0i131i67j0j0i20i263j0i67.ZH9E-bCLKKE

 

  1. JPMorgan agrees to $135 million settlement for improper handling of .https://www.jurist.org/…/jpmorgan-agrees-to-135-million-settlement-for-improper-ha…

Dec 27, 2018 – The SEC found that JPMorgan had improperly provided ADRs in … JPMorgan marked the fourth depository bank that the SEC has brought … to the brokerage firms who profited from the improper handling of ADRs. … On Ignorance of Binding Law: The President, the National Security Advisor, and Congress

B.      Bad News for Deutsche Bank Is Bad News for Wall Street and Trump wallstreetonparade.com/…/bad-news-for-deutsche-bank-is-bad-news-for-wall-street-an…

Jan 23, 2019 – An earlier report in September of last year by the Wall Street Journal identified Citigroup … to a whistleblower complaint filed with the SEC over two years ago. … for Deutsche Bank or the big Wall Street banks like JPMorgan Chase, … Likewise, Congress remains in the dark on whether loans Deutsche Bank

  1.  Deutsche Bank and JP Morgan’s  Mortgage Investing and Mortgage Activities are INTRINSICALLY TIED TO and funded with these Banks  Unlawful Money Laundering and Predatory Financial Activities. BUT FOR The Unlawful Funds these Defendants would have NOT been able to FUND the  Acquisitions and Investments ….. NO ACTUAL LOANS  SEEM TO HAVE BEEN MADE.

 

  1.   These Defendants and Their Lawyers  are well aware of Their Own Unlawful and SECRETED conduct and at this time are pursuing a POLICE ACTION against Your Plaintiff to have Her put in the Street and Made Homeless.   Said Actions will  Cause SEVER IRREPARABLE HARM  and DAMAGES to Plaintiff and as such Plaintiff moves the Court to issue a Temporary Injunction until such time a full  Restraining Order can issue PENDING a TRIAL ON THE MERITS in this Case.

 

  1.  The Secreting of Unlawful Conduct has been demonstrated against these Perpetrators by FBI, DOJ, OCC, CFPB, FinCen THE WHITE HOUSE, CONGRESS, THE SENATE and countless many many International News Organizations.   THESE DEFENDANTS have wholly refused to cooperate or produce any discovery and as such CONTINUES to FRAUDULENTLY CONCEAL Their Illegal Activities regarding Funding and Investing in US Predatory Subprime Mortgages.

 

  1.  These Defendants and Their Lawyers  are well aware of Their Own Unlawful and SECRETED conduct and at this time are pursuing a POLICE ACTION against Your Plaintiff to have Her put in the Street and Made Homeless.   Said Actions will  Cause SEVER IRREPARABLE HARM  and DAMAGES to Plaintiff and as such Plaintiff moves the Court to issue an ORDER FOR  DISCOVERY and that these Defendants be required to  PRODUCE a full range of Discovery to get to the Bottom of  WHY SO MANY Billions upon Billions in Fines, Penalties, And Settlements have been issued  AGAINST THESE DEFENDANTS. Until such time a full Restraining Order can issue PENDING a TRIAL ON THE MERITS in this Case …. These Defendant’s should be ORDERED to Produce Their Books associated with the Billions upon Billions in Fines and Penalties   AND ALL Information, Records and Files Associated with Their MONEY LAUNDERING ACTIVITIES that enabled Them to engage in the Predatory Subprime Mortgage Industry.

 

  1.   GENERALLY SEE   Global Law Enforcement News Media Accounts and Information available on GLOBAL  MEDIA OUTLETS

 

https://www.google.com/search?ei=m0OZXLTEHZLI_QbL4rfQCA&q=Money+Laundering+Conspiracy+Chase+JP+Morgan+Deutsche+Bank++Danske+Bank&oq=Money+Laundering+Conspiracy+Chase+JP+Morgan+Deutsche+Bank++Danske+Bank&gs_l=psy-ab.12…0.0..10979…0.0..0.0.0…….0……gws-wiz.HcOgGz80fN4

  1.   Many Many Many Governments Accounts of fines, penalties and settlements including the payment of Many Many BILLIONS to US and Foreign Law Enforcement Agencies and Central Governments are WELL KNOWN and  COMMON KNOWLEDGE throughout the World. These Defendants prior conduct and current secreting of the Mortgage Fundings with Laundered Money is an ONGOING MATTER.

 

9.      February  7,   2019  Just 29 days after THE PRESENT CASE WAS FIELD  the US Congress Announces yet another investigation and probe

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-02-07/wall-street-nemesis-to-join-house-panel-s-deutsche-bank-probe

  1.     Wall Street Nemesis Joins House Panel’s Deutsche Bank Probe

Robert Schmidt

Greg Farrell

February 7, 2019, 1:52 PM EST Updated on February 7, 2019, 5:06 PM EST

 

Bob Roach to Join House Financial Services Deutsche Bank Probe …

 

https://www.bloomberg.com/…/wall-street-nemesis-to-join-house-panel-s-deutsche-ba…

 

  1.  JPMorgan Chase’s $5.3M Sanctions Settlement: Some Lessons …

https://www.law.com/…/10/…/jp-morgan-chases-5-3m-sanctions-settlement-some-lessons…

Oct 9, 2018 – JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s nearly $5.3 million civil settlement quashing allegations that the bank handled dozens of payments benefiting Iranian …

D. Here’s the staggering amount banks have been fined since the https://www.marketwatch.com › Economy & Politics › Capitol Report Feb 24, 2018 – Bank of America and JPMorgan Chase have paid the largest fines, according … For example, a Goldman Sachs GS,  commitment for $1.8 billion of … was considered as part of a $5.1 billion “finethe bank had to pay.

E.   JPMorgan Chase | Violation Tracker

https://violationtracker.goodjobsfirst.org/parent/jpmorgan-chase

The penalty dollar total above may be adjusted to account for the fact that the list of entries … and settlement announcements for the same case; or else a penalty covering … J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A., investor …

F.   JPMorgan agrees $13 billion settlement with U.S. over bad mortgages …

https://www.reuters.com/…jpmorgan-settlement/jpmorgan-agrees-13-billion-settlement…

Nov 19, 2013 – In late September, JPMorgan Chief Executive Jamie Dimon walked into … on a conference call, said the bank had not admitted to violating any laws. … A sign outside the headquarters of JP Morgan Chase & Co in New York, …

  1.    The Many Many  BILLIONS in Settlements, Fines and Penalties   DWARF the amounts of Funds Laundered by these Defendants that have been  HIDDEN and COMMINGLED in these Banks Accounts making the Mortgage Business as described in this case possible.  These Banks used these Monies to fund Their Mortgage Investing Activities by way of the Money Laundering.
  2.    Putting Your IFP  Plaintiff out of the Family Home will cause enormous harm to Her and cause serious and insurmountable damages to Her Rights to Meaningful Access to the Courts to secure Her Due Process, Equal Protection and Property Interests in Her Residence.  A  TRO Should Issue and a Full Injunction Placed against any EVICTION of Plaintiff pending the Outcome of  ADEQUATE DISCOVERY and a FULL TRIAL on the Merits of this case.
  1. JPMorgan Chase  has been fined in excess of  $44 billion for laundering untold Billions
  2. Deutsche Bank has paid fines in excess of   $14  Billion  and the Congressional, FBI, DOJ and  CFPB Investigations are ONGOING.
  3. JPMorgan Chase | Violation Tracker https://violationtracker.goodjobsfirst.org/parent/jpmorgan-chase  The penalty dollar total above may be adjusted to account for the fact that the list of entries … and settlement announcements for the same case; or else a penalty covering … J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A., investor …

D. JPMorgan agrees $13 billion settlement with U.S. over bad mortgages … https://www.reuters.com/…jpmorgan-settlement/jpmorgan-agrees-13-billion-settlement…

Nov 19, 2013 – In late September, JPMorgan Chief Executive Jamie Dimon walked into … on a conference call, said the bank had not admitted to violating any laws. … A sign outside the headquarters of JP Morgan Chase & Co in New York, …

E. The biggest bank settlements of all-time – Business Insider https://www.businessinsider.com/the-biggest-bank-settlements-of-all-time-2017-4Apr 27, 2017 – JPMorgan Chase: $5.29 billion. 9. … About $2.48 billion of the settlement will be paid as a civil penalty and $2.1 billion will go toward consumer …

F. How Much Have Banks Been Fined Since the Crisis? – DSNews https://dsnews.com › Daily Dose

Feb 21, 2018 – JPMorgan Chase is second on the list with $43.7 billion in fines. There is a significant drop off after that, with the third-highest fine load going to … a pair of April 2016 settlement agreements between Goldman Sachs, the U.S. …

G.  7 years on from crisis, $150 billion in bank fines and penalties https://www.cnbc.com/…/7-years-on-from-crisis-150-billion-in-bank-fines-and-penalti…

Apr 30, 2015 – JPMorgan Chase has already settled with the same investor group, … in fines, settlements and other penalties, according to a tally by the Financial Times. ….. UBS. US Bank. Wells Fargo. Where it went. Image. The Justice …

H.  JPMorgan to Pay $135 Million for Improper Handling of ADRs https://www.bloomberg.com/…/jpmorgan-to-pay-135-million-for-improper-handling-…

Dec 26, 2018 – JPMorgan Chase & Co. will pay $135 million to settle Securities and … shares of foreign companies, the latest bank fined in an industry crackdown on the practice. … million to settle similar SEC charges and Deutsche Bank AG agreed to … The SEC said on Wednesday that the JPMorgan settlement was the …

  1. JPMorgan Chase: Corporate Rap Sheet | Corporate Research Project https://www.corp-research.org/jpmorganchase

Feb 3, 2017 – JPMorgan Chase By Philip Mattera. … a key role in the $13 billion settlement JPMorgan reached with the U.S. Justice … The water operation was soon sold off, but the Bank of Manhattan thrived …. In November 2009 the SEC announced that J.P. Morgan Securities would pay a penalty of $25 million, make a …

  1.    J.P. Morgan to Pay $153.6 Million to Settle SEC Charges of … – SEC.gov https://www.sec.gov/news/press/2011/2011-131.htm   Jun 21, 2011 – Harmed Investors Getting Their Money Back, Firm to Pay Penalty and … Under the settlement, harmed investors will receive all of their money back. … Financial institutions in East Asia including Tokyo Star Bank, Far Glory Life …

 

  1.     [PDF]  Regulating the “Too Big to Jail” Financial Institutions

https://ecollections.law.fiu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1367&context=faculty…

by JW Markham – ‎2018 – ‎Cited by 3 – ‎Related articles

May 1, 2018 – deutschebank-mortgages-settlement-idUSKBN14CO41 … shareholders, a tax that Congress did not levy. …. and judges, with penal sanctions in the form of fines, imprisonment, …. The SEC Settlement Model Sets the Stage for Too Big to …… JPMorgan Chase, who was charged with misleading investors.

 

  1.    JPMorgan Is Penalized $2 Billion Over Madoff – The New York Times

https://dealbook.nytimes.com/…/jpmorgan-settles-with-federal-authorities-in-madoff-c… Jan 7, 2014 – The bank will pay the fine, a record for a violation of the BankJPMorgan Chase has reached settlements with federal authorities who … On Tuesday, Mr. Bharara announced the culmination of that case, imposing a $1.7 billion penaltyThe charges against JPMorgan, the result of an F.B.I. investigation …

M.    Prosecutors and F.B.I. Examine JPMorgan Over Losses – The New https://dealbook.nytimes.com/…/prosecutors-eye-penalties-over-trading-at-jpmorgan-c… Aug 11, 2013 – Deutsche Bank Said No. … Lucas Jackson/Reuters JPMorgan Chase’s New York headquarters. … people briefed on the matter, could yield a fine and a reprimand of the bank … Now JPMorgan is in settlement talks with the Securities and … the S.E.C. is seeking to extract an admission of wrongdoing from the

N.    Corporate Fines and Settlements compiled by George Draffan www.endgame.org/corpfines1.html SEC officials said ABB notified the government of the violations and cooperated … Monday that ABN AMRO Bank N.V. will have to pay an $80 million penalty in ….. with J.P. Morgan Chase on July 1, Bank One was the last of the four to settle. ….. raft of tough new state laws on data security as well as several bills in Congress.

  1.  The Financial Crisis 10 Years Later: Lessons Learned – Paul, Weiss https://www.paulweiss.com/media/3978004/14sept18-financial-crisis.pdf

Sep 15, 2018 – Impact of the Financial Crisis on Market Participants and the ….. agenda also included the SEC’s $285 million settlement with … settlement with a single entity in American history”);38 J.P. Morgan, $13 billion;39 Deutsche Bank, $7.2 …. Countrywide, the Government obtained a $1.27 billion penalty after trial, …

III.

There are Many Many Many More Reports and Law Enforcement Government Accounts from ALL AROUND THE WORLD

  1. Schiff questions Mueller’s approach on Deutsche Bank …

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/02/10/schiff-mueller-trump&#8230;

House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff on Sunday raised doubts about the extent to which special counsel Robert Mueller has probed President Donald Trump’s dealings with Deutsche Bank, bolstering …

2.   Danske Bank scandal: Federal Reserve probes Deutsche Bank …

https://www.businessinsider.com/danske-bank-scandal-federal&#8230;

The Fed probe is looking at Deutsche Bank’s handling of billions in suspicious payments from Danske Bank — adding a twist in the €200 billion scandal. … The US Federal Reserve is …

3.    Factbox: Democrats in U.S. Congress take aim at Trump with …

Reuters

8 days ago · United States. Politics. … has expressed interest in looking into Deutsche Bank documents. … whether previous testimony given to Congress and federal investigators by figures associated with …

 

4.    Deutsche Bank faces inquiry from congressional committees …

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/02/01/deutsche-bank&#8230;

Feb 22, 2019 · Deutsche Bank, which has long been President Trump’s primary lender, has received an “inquiry” from two congressional House committees. The subject of the inquiry and its timing were not …

5.     Democrats urge Deutsche Bank to audit accounts held by …

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/may/24/deutsche-bank&#8230;

Democrats urge Deutsche Bank to audit accounts held by Trump and family. The FBI is investigating possible collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Kremlin following an assessment by US intelligence agencies that Russian state actors interfered in the US election. Trump’s finances are not believed to be at the centre of the probe,…

6.     US House Chairman wants Mueller to probe Trump’s Deutsche …

https://www.ripplesnigeria.com/us-house-chairman-wants-mueller-to&#8230;

  1. Representative Adam Schiff wants an immediate probe into US President Donald Trump’s link with Deutsche Bank. Schiff who also doubles as the Democratic chairman of the US House Committee …

7.      Deutsche Bank shares slip on reports of investigation over …

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/01/23/shares-in-deutsche-bank-slip-on&#8230;

Jan 23, 2019 · Shares in Deutsche Bank fell more than 1 percent in early trading on reports that the U.S. Federal Reserve is investigating the German lender’s role in a money laundering scheme.

 

  • Author: Spriha Srivastava

 

8.      Deutsche Bank headquarters raided in Panama Papers probe

https://www.wanttoknow.info/a-deutsche-bank-headquarters-raided&#8230;

Deutsche Bank headquarters raided in Panama Papers probe as reported by CNN. As of Feb. 24, we’re $1,100 in the red for the year. Please donate here to support this vital work. Subscribe here to our free email list for two information-packed emails per week. Toggle navigation Home.

9.      US lawmakers to look into reported FBI probe into Trump …

https://www.dw.com/en/us-lawmakers-to-look-into-reported-fbi-probe&#8230;

US lawmakers to look into reported FBI probe into Trump A committee in the US Congress will seek more information about the reported FBI investigation into Donald Trump, a …

10.      FBI Visits Deutsche Bank Trader Robert Wallden … – wsj.com

https://www.wsj.com/articles/fbi-visited-deutsche-bank-trader-in&#8230;

Agents from the FBI showed up at the home of a New York-based currencies trader for Deutsche Bank With ‘chat’ transcripts, according to people familiar with the incident, as regulators step up ..

 

        Wherefore Premises Considered  Plaintiff Moves this Court to Issue a TRO and Upon Full Hearing a Permanent Injunction   PENDING FULL Investigation and Discovery and the conclusion of a Full and Complete JURY TRIAL.

  1. These Defendants Lawyers PREVARICATIONS and Claims that PLAINTIFF’s CLAIMS are  frivolous and vexatious, and are an ongoing abuse of judicial process or  Made in Bad Faith is  ABSURD.   Quite Obviously  these Defendants have paid  many BILLIONS in Fines and Penalties,   They have many many times Hidden Records, Information and Materials from Consumers and Law Enforcement  and currently possess the  Credibility and Record of the  Dillinger or Alphonse Capone MAFIAS.   ( Much Worse  EMPHASIS  ADDED  )